The Problem
Every day, a new Sitecore project is delivered somewhere in the world. Thousands of developers, architects, consultants, and agencies help organizations implement Sitecore. But ultimately, who pays for all of it? The business.
How do business stakeholders such as content authors, marketers, product owners, and technology leaders know they received value for their investment? More importantly, how do they know that a Sitecore project delivered at high speed over a few months will not become a long-term maintenance burden once the implementation partner has moved on and the support contract has ended?
In theory, having a technically competent person with software architecture experience act as a gatekeeper for the client should be enough. In reality, however, Sitecore is about much more than code. It involves data modeling, information architecture, SEO, governance, content authoring experience, and platform best practices.
Sitecore itself contains many concepts that have their own best practices, including Rendering Variants, Placeholder Settings, Rendering Parameters, Page Builder, Standard Values, Branch Templates, and more. As a result, organizations often need someone who understands Sitecore specifically, not just software architecture in general.
Unfortunately, this is not always possible. Many organizations rely on their implementation partner, Sitecore representatives, or programs such as Sitecore 360 to validate that they are getting value from their investment. While these can certainly help, they are often constrained by the number of hours and scope defined in the contract. As a result, important implementation details can still be overlooked.
The Solution
My recommendation is simple: hire your own Sitecore expert.
This does not necessarily need to be a full-time position. Even bringing in an experienced Sitecore specialist on a contract basis during the project can significantly reduce risk. Ideally, this person should have substantial hands-on experience delivering Sitecore solutions and should be able to independently review architecture, implementation quality, content authoring experience, and platform best practices.
One point worth clarifying: I would not use the Sitecore MVP title as the primary measure of technical expertise.
If you're unfamiliar with the program, Sitecore MVP recognition is awarded for contributions to the Sitecore community, not specifically for implementation expertise. Community contributions are valuable and should absolutely be recognized, but they are not the same as hands-on experience delivering and governing complex Sitecore solutions. For that reason, I prefer to evaluate Sitecore expertise and MVP status as two separate things.
That said, not every organization can justify hiring an independent Sitecore expert. So what can business stakeholders do to validate the quality of a Sitecore implementation on their own?
The checklist below provides a practical set of validation points that any business stakeholder can use when reviewing deliverables from a Sitecore implementation partner.
Note: In Sitecore, most pages are built using reusable components. Content authors typically assemble these components using Page Builder or Experience Editor, where they can edit content inline and add, remove, or rearrange components without requiring developer assistance.
Sitecore Implementation Validation Checklist
1. Test Content Authoring Thoroughly
Open key pages such as the homepage, landing pages, news pages, event pages, blogs, and article pages in Page Builder or Experience Editor.
Try editing everything you see. If a component contains a background image, you should be able to change it. If it uses configurable colors, you should be able to update them. Content authors should not need developer assistance for routine content changes.
2. Validate Component Self-Service Capabilities
If a component displays a collection of similar items, such as cards, news articles, or promotions, try adding that component directly from Page Builder.
You should be able to create, remove, and reorder associated content without having to switch to Content Editor and manually create supporting items.
3. Verify Datasource Governance
If a component requires a datasource, Sitecore should only allow authors to create compatible datasource items.
Authors should not be able to select unsupported datasource types because doing so may break the component or produce inconsistent results.
4. Ensure Component Previews Are Available
Authors should be able to preview components before adding them to a page.
This is typically achieved using rendering thumbnails. While often overlooked during development, thumbnails significantly improve the content authoring experience.
5. Review Security Permissions
Security is critical, especially in multi-site implementations.
Users should only be able to access the sites, content, and media items they are authorized to manage. Unauthorized content should never be visible through the Sitecore interface.
6. Confirm the Site Uses Published Content Only
Verify that the live website serves content exclusively from published sources.
Under no circumstances should production sites retrieve content directly from Master, Preview, or other non-production databases.
7. Test Workflows End-to-End
Content workflows do more than support approvals. They can also enforce business rules and validation logic.
Test the complete workflow process by moving content through each workflow state, publishing it, and confirming that the published version appears correctly on the live environment.
8. Check Component Naming Conventions
Templates, renderings, and field names should be clear and meaningful.
Poor naming conventions create confusion for content authors and increase the long-term maintenance cost of the solution.
9. Audit the Content Tree
Review the content structure in Content Editor.
Look for unnecessary folders, abandoned content, temporary pages, duplicate items, and poorly named content such as "test-page" or "killer-page". A clean content tree is often a sign of a disciplined implementation.
10. Measure Page Performance
Page load time is one of the best indicators of implementation quality.
As a general guideline, key pages should load within 1 to 2 seconds under normal network conditions. Pages that consistently exceed this should be investigated to identify performance bottlenecks.
11. Validate Link Management
Ensure links are implemented correctly and are not hardcoded.
Links should resolve dynamically based on the current environment and language context. For example, a production page should never redirect users to a development or staging environment.
12. Review Multilingual Behavior
Not all content fields should behave the same way across languages.
Some fields should be shared across all languages, while others should be versioned per language. Review these requirements carefully and validate them before project sign-off.
13. Own the Content Authoring Process Before Go-Live
I strongly recommend that business users begin authoring content before the site launches.
Hands-on content creation is one of the fastest ways to uncover usability issues, workflow gaps, and implementation defects that would otherwise remain hidden until after launch.
14. Test Licensed Features Thoroughly
If you purchased additional products such as Sitecore Analytics, CDP, Personalize, or other platform capabilities, now is the time to validate them.
Do not rely solely on vendor demonstrations. Test real-world scenarios and verify that the implementation meets actual business requirements.
15. Review Application Logs
Always request application log analysis covering at least the last few weeks before launch.
Ensure there are no unresolved critical exceptions. Investigate recurring errors and warnings, and where necessary, validate findings with Sitecore support. Many issues exist below the UI layer and are invisible to business users unless someone actively reviews the logs.
Final Thoughts
A successful Sitecore project is not measured by whether it was delivered on time. It is measured by how effectively content authors can use it, how maintainable it remains over time, and how well it supports business goals long after the implementation partner has left.
Even if you do not have an independent Sitecore expert reviewing the project, a structured validation process can help identify risks before they become expensive long-term problems.
Hope this helps you!!
Comments
Post a Comment