Skip to main content

Sitecore XP: How to use site specific workflow when global workflow assigned on template standard values?

The Problem

We were working with Sitecore XP 10.1 using ASP.NET MVC. Our solution had more than 100 Sitecore sites, and all page items and datasource items used the a Base workflow. The workflow was assigned globally through template standard values. However, some sites needed a simpler workflow with fewer states. We decided to introduce a new workflow called Simple Workflow for these sites. The plan was to create a script that would run against the sites requiring the simpler workflow and update the workflow and state fields of their existing items. This would move the existing content to the new workflow. However, there was another scenario to consider. Since the old workflow was still configured on the standard values of all item templates, any new item created on these sites could inherit the old workflow instead of Simple Workflow To address this, we planned to implement a custom processor that would update the workflow of newly created items to match the workflow used by the rest of the site. Before implementing this approach, we wanted to make sure we were not missing any other scenarios.

The Question

Item creation was one obvious scenario, but what about other content operations? Could copying an item, duplicating it, creating a new version, or performing another operation cause Sitecore to assign the old workflow again? We wanted to identify all possible scenarios where an item could end up using the old workflow, even after the site had switched to Simple Workflow. We raised this question with Sitecore Support.

What Sitecore Support Found

Sitecore Support registered a feature request under reference number PDXP-33434. The request can be tracked for consideration in a future product release. Based on their review and testing, the primary scenario where the old workflow would be assigned was during item creation. When a new item is created, the workflow defined on the template standard values is applied. Since our templates still had Base Workflow configured globally, newly created items could inherit that workflow. Support considered our proposed approach of using a custom processor to update the workflow of newly created items reasonable for addressing this behaviour.

What About Copying, Duplicating and Creating Versions?

Sitecore Support also tested several common content operations:
  • Creating additional versions
  • Copying items
  • Duplicating items
In their testing, these operations retained the workflow already assigned to the source item rather than reapplying the workflow from template standard values. This means that once an item had been updated to use Simple Workflow, these operations did not cause it to revert to Base Workflow in the scenarios tested. Based on these findings, Support did not identify additional out-of-the-box content operations that would automatically reassign the workflow from template standard values after an item had already been switched to the new workflow.

What Else Should We Check?

Although the standard Sitecore operations tested by Support did not reveal additional scenarios, there are still custom implementations to consider. For example, custom code, integrations, content import processes, or administrative scripts might explicitly update the __Workflow field. These operations are outside the standard behaviour reviewed by Support, so they should be checked separately. In a solution with more than 100 sites, it is worth reviewing these custom processes before concluding that the workflow migration is complete.

Conclusion

The key finding from this investigation was that item creation was the primary scenario identified by Sitecore Support where the old workflow could be assigned because of the workflow configured on template standard values. The proposed custom processor appeared to be a reasonable way to handle newly created items on sites using Simple Workflow. Copying items, duplicating items, and creating additional versions did not reassign the old workflow in Support's testing. However, custom code and integrations that explicitly update workflow fields still need to be considered. When changing workflows across multiple Sitecore sites, it is important to account for both existing content and the way new items inherit their workflow configuration. Hope this helps!

Comments

POPULAR POSTS

Sitecore PowerShell Script to create all language versions for an item from en version

  We have lots of media items and our business wants to copy the data from en version of media item to all other language versions defined in System/Languages. This ensures that media is available in all the languages. So, we created the below powershell script to achieve the same -  #Get all language versions defined in System/Languages $languages = Get-ChildItem /sitecore/System/Languages -recurse | Select $_.name | Where-Object {$_.name -ne "en"} | Select Name #Ensuring correct items are updated by comparing the template ID  $items = Get-ChildItem -Path "/sitecore/media library/MyProjects" -Recurse | Where-Object {'<media item template id>' -contains $_.TemplateID} #Bulk update context to improve performance New-UsingBlock (New-Object Sitecore.Data.BulkUpdateContext) { foreach($item in $items){    foreach($language in $languages){ $languageVersion = Get-Item -Path $item.Paths.Path -Language $language.Name #Check if language versi...

Export Sitecore media library files to zip using SPE

If you ever require to export Sitecore media files to zip (may be to optimize them), SPE (Sitecore Powershell Extension) has probably the easiest way to do this for you. It's as easy as the below 3 steps -  1. Right click on your folder (icons folder in snap)>Click on Scripts> Click on Download 2. SPE will start zipping all the media files placed within this folder. 3. Once zipping is done, you will see the Download option in the next screen. Click Download Zip containing the media files within is available on your local machine. You can play around with the images now. Hope this helps!! Like and Share ;)

Make Sitecore instance faster using Roslyn Compiler

When we install the Sitecore instance on local, the first load is slow. After each code deploy also, it takes a while for the Sitecore instance to load and experience editor to come up. For us, the load time for Sitecore instance on local machines was around 4 minutes. We started looking for ways to minimize it and found that if we update our Web.config to use Roslyn compiler and include the relevant Nugets into the project, our load times will improve. We followed the simple steps - Go to the Project you wish to add the NuGet package and right click the project and click 'Manage NuGet Packages'. Make sure your 'Package Source' is set to nuget.org and go to the 'Browse' Tab and search Microsoft.CodeDom.Providers.DotNetCompilerPlatform. Install whichever version you desire, make sure you note which version you installed. You can learn more about it  here . After installation, deploy your project, make sure the Microsoft.CodeDom.Providers.DotNetCompilerPlatform.d...

Experience of a first time Sitecore MVP

The Journey I have been working in Sitecore for almost 10 years now. When I was a beginner in Sitecore, I was highly impressed by the incredible community support. In fact, my initial Sitecore learning path was entirely based on community written blogs on Sitecore. During a discussion with my then technology lead Neeraj Gulia , he proposed the idea that I should start giving back to developer community whenever I get chance. Just like I have been helped by many developers via online blogs, stackoverflow etc., I should also try to help others. Fast forward a few years and I met  Nehemiah Jeyakumar  (now an MVP). He had a big archive of his technical notes in the form Sitecore blogs. I realized my first blog dont have to be perfect and it can be as simple as notes to a specific problem for reference in future. That's when I probably created my first blog post on Sitecore. At that time, I didn't knew about the Sitecore MVP program. Over the years, I gained more confidence to writ...

Clean Coding Principles in CSharp

A code shall be easy to read and understand. In this post, I am outlining basic principles  about clean coding after researching through expert recommended books, trainings and based on my experience. A common example to start with is a variable declaration like - int i  The above statement did not clarify the purpose of variable i. However,  the same variable can be declared as -  int pageNumber The moment we declared the variable as int pageNumber, our brain realized that the variable is going to store the value for number of pages. We have set the context in our brain now and it is ready to understand what the code is going to do next with these page numbers. This is one of the basic advantages of clean coding. Reasons for clean coding -  • Reading clean code is easier - Every code is revisited after certain amount of time either by the same or different developer who created it. In both the cases, if the code is unclean, its difficult to understand and u...